Which Mazda crossover is right for you? | Mazda CX-5 or Mazda CX-30

Which Mazda crossover is right for you? | Mazda CX-5 or Mazda CX-30


Which Mazda crossover is right for you? | Mazda CX-5 or Mazda CX-30

There’s plenty of overlap between Mazda’s smallest crossovers.

Shop for the new Mazda CX-30 on CarGurus: https://cargur.us/FW27k
Shop for the new Mazda CX-5 on CarGurus: https://cargur.us/Mpry6

Sometimes, car names can get confusing. There was the CX-3, now there’s a CX-30. Your neighbor has a CX-5, but is that better than a CX-30? How do you keep it all straight? Clifford Atiyeh drives both to determine which is the better buy.

For more information on the 2021 Mazda CX-30, read the full review on CarGurus: https://cargur.us/Mprwp
For more information on the 2021 Mazda CX-5, read the full review on CarGurus: https://cargur.us/MprxG

Video review: Clifford Atiyeh
Cinematography: https://www.VennCreativeMedia.com
Written CX-30 review: Christian Wardlaw
Written CX-5 review: Eileen Falkenberg-Hull

Subscribe to the CarGurus Channel:    / cargurus  

#Mazda #CX30 #CX5
---------
0:00 The CX-30 OR the CX-5?
1:53 Exterior Dimensions
2:15 Styling
3:22 Inside the CX-5
4:19 Inside the CX-30
4:58 Cargo Space
5:28 CX-5 Driving Impressions
9:08 CX-5 Fuel Economy
9:51 CX-30 Driving Impressions
12:30 CX-30 Fuel Economy
13:43 Technology and Safety
15:15 Pricing and the Competition
15:42 Final Thoughts


Content

1.52 -> spoiler alert in this comparison video the  mazda's gonna win but which mazda and why  
7.36 -> well every automaker has a lineup with cars that  overlap in size price and features so the point  
13.92 -> of this video is to tell you which of these mazdas  is right for you these are two very popular mazdas  
20.08 -> compact cx-5 and the sub-compact cx-30  both of these are identical turbocharged  
26.4 -> powertrains they're the top trims you can  buy and they cost between 36 and 39 000  
31.76 -> now we reviewed both of these cars separately  you can watch those if you subscribe to our  
35.76 -> youtube channel you know where to go but  mazdas of a certain feather flock together  
40.72 -> that's why they're here right now if your  heart is set on a new mazda crossover  
45.44 -> this is the video to watch i'm going to show  you the differences between both these cars  
49.84 -> you might have heard we're mazda fans we are they  drive well they feel upscale they look pretty no  
55.76 -> matter which model we're reviewing we named the  current gen cx-5 as our 2021 editor's choice for  
61.68 -> the best used car the cx-30 was new for 2020 and  there's not enough data yet to recommend it but  
68.32 -> i've tested a 2020 with the naturally aspirated  engine and matt smith tested this 2021 turbo i  
74.08 -> haven't driven a cx-5 in a long while but the rest  of the cargurus team has driven one of every kind  
79.68 -> every year the big mouth grille and that chrome  eyeliner tracing underneath the led headlights  
85.76 -> that's the mazda look that everyone knows by  now the two of these cars really do look very  
90.24 -> much the same from the front there's some slightly  different lighting patterns that you'll see behind  
94.32 -> me but here's the real difference the cx-30 is  based on the new mazda 3 hatchback the cx-5 is not  
100.72 -> in fact cx-5 that's based on a car that goes back  to 2013. and even though it was refreshed in 2017  
106.64 -> and mazda called it an all-new cx-5 technically  the chassis and that standard powertrain are the  
112.24 -> same the cx-5 may not look as big on screen but  next to the cx-30 it is it's six inches longer  
119.68 -> overall the wheelbase is stretched by another two  inches it's also front and rear two inches wider  
125.52 -> the cx-30 is actually a half inch higher off the  ground a total of eight inches versus seven and a  
130.56 -> half but vertically it's three and a half inches  shorter than that car this is the cx-30 2.5 turbo  
138.72 -> premium plus 18 inch black wheels and mirrors  which come on every turbo big plastic fenders like  
145.04 -> a subaru crosstrek standard roof rails and very  eye-catching lighting just look at the led turn  
152.08 -> signal which fades like an incandescent bulb mazda  does little details like that because it cares  
158.4 -> this is the cx-5 signature 19-inch silver wheels  but if you like the darker effect a new trim for  
164.4 -> 2021 will do that it's called the carbon edition  roof rails are not standard and the lights on the  
169.92 -> cx-5 are nice but not as hot as the cx-30s mazda  has exceptional paint quality on either of these  
176.4 -> cars the finishes belong on luxury cars luxury  is the whole point of these two top mazda trims  
183.44 -> both are minimalist and a bit austere just like  the best german cars but everything you can  
188.4 -> touch grab or knock against is padded stitched or  knurled the tactile quality is top notch and it's  
195.84 -> right up there with entry level luxury crossovers  like the lexus ux and mercedes gla for 2021  
203.12 -> every cx-5 gets this new 10-inch screen versus  the 8-inch from before also this is the signature  
209.12 -> trim and that means you get this wood which to  me looks pretty fake mazda says it's real and  
214.72 -> napa leather which is a softer grade leather  found in the higher end luxury cars they call  
219.04 -> it brown and i'm not color blind i swear but i  cannot tell the difference between this and black  
225.12 -> these upper trims have heated and cooled  front seats a heated steering wheel  
229.28 -> and heated rear seats but where are those controls  well they're hidden right here it took me a long  
235.92 -> time to figure that out and the usb ports  are hidden in here and that means that if  
240.24 -> you have someone actually sitting in this rear  position or a car seat or this seat is folded  
245.04 -> you can't heat your bum and you  can't charge your phone but otherwise  
248.16 -> sitting back here in the cx-5 it's a heck of  a lot better than that cx30 in every dimension  
253.2 -> and this front passenger seat is powered where in  that top trim in the cx-30 it's entirely manual
262.32 -> being in the second row of the cx-30 is like  sitting in the third row of a midsize suv  
267.28 -> it is tight this seat is where i was sitting  before i'm 511 and i feel like mazda put more  
273.36 -> room for the blind spots behind me than my actual  head and my legs and my shoulders also there's no  
279.6 -> heated rear seats up front the cx-30 is most like  the mazda 3 hatchback there's no twin central air  
285.6 -> vents there's separate designs from the driver  and the passenger and the screen it's only  
290.32 -> nine inches versus the 10 you'll find in the new  cx-5 but this steering wheel's a whole lot nicer  
295.28 -> the switches and everything on here just looks  more modern space comes at a premium in any small  
300.48 -> suv but especially the cx-30 there's 20 cubic feet  behind the rear seats and 45 when they're folded  
306.32 -> that's actually less than the mazda 3 hatchback  the cx-5 you get 50 percent more when they're  
311.84 -> behind the rear seats for 31 cubic feet and 25  percent more when they're folded at 60 cubic feet  
317.76 -> those numbers are big space is at a premium in the  cx-30 but the engines transmissions and all-wheel  
325.04 -> drive are exactly the same between both cars let's  take each one out on the road for this test i am  
330.8 -> not driving the base two and a half liter engine  this is the two and a half liter turbo four so  
336.16 -> instead of 187 horsepower there's 250 instead of  186 pound-feet of torque there's 320 that is a lot  
345.36 -> in a small car like the cx-5 now if you use 87  octane the numbers drop a little bit the torque  
352.32 -> goes down to 310 the horsepower to 227 but that's  really you know not a big difference the fact  
358.64 -> that it can run on both fuels and deliver very  similar performance is pretty good but i gotta say  
365.28 -> even in sport mode it doesn't really take  off like i would think with an engine with  
370.88 -> this much potency especially in the low range it  doesn't really deliver that i think part of it  
375.84 -> is due to the six-speed automatic it's good but  it's down a few gears from some of the latest  
380.8 -> transmissions you'll find in competitors seven  speed eight speed and what that does you just get  
387.04 -> more off the line torque and the lower gears and  the higher gears give you better fuel efficiency  
392.32 -> with these six speeds they're old enough now where  there's more gaps so there's just more spacing and  
399.12 -> what that means is that it just does not feel as  reactive it's gonna be fine for most buyers but  
404.48 -> i'm just gonna say right now i don't think the  turbo is necessarily worth the price premium  
410 -> you'll pay versus the regular naturally ask  rated engine drive both tell us what you think  
416.48 -> what i do like about the turbo is that it's pretty  smooth and refined and you get this nice gradual  
422.56 -> acceleration in any gear that's really what you're  paying for with this turbo versus the naturally  
427.92 -> aspirated engine there's just a little bit more  thrust going on at all revs it's very gentle to me  
435.2 -> a little too gentle i want it to punch harder and  even with these paddle shifters when i'm shifting  
440.96 -> i'll go in a second i mean that's not slow by any  means but it's also just doesn't hit you the great  
448.56 -> thing about the cx-5 is that the handling's really  good steering turning it's fast feels pretty  
454.48 -> accurate it drives like really like a luxury car  would you're not getting this in a lot of cars  
460.64 -> not even the latest hyundai and kias they still  haven't completely sorted out those suspensions  
466.08 -> the mazda has for a long time uh nothing new  to the people of mazda so when you drive it  
471.6 -> you really do feel like you're more connected to  the car and every time we drive one that's what we  
475.92 -> inevitably say in these reviews not making it up  it's just the way it is however i think there is  
481.52 -> some trade-offs here because there's no adaptive  dampers it's not really the smoothest ride  
487.84 -> it's a little firm right now i'm on a perfectly  paved road so it's excellent any car would be  
491.84 -> a lamborghini avenator would be but when you're  in the cx-5 and the road breaks up a little bit  
497.68 -> it definitely sends some shutters through the  cabin it's not like we're driving some amg gt  
502.88 -> like on a race track like we've done before this  is just a regular car but the suspension is still  
508.72 -> stiff i was not expecting that usually  with cars you're going to find a ride  
513.52 -> and handling balance right but you pay more for  that and when i realized that this car is about  
518.8 -> under forty thousand dollars fully loaded and it  starts in the low twenties the setup is actually  
524.4 -> pretty good because a lot of cars that are more  expensive do worse when i was in the mercedes  
528.32 -> gla that car was like fifty thousand dollars and  it rode horribly and it handled pretty bad too  
535.28 -> this mazda handles really well but the  trade-off is that that ride feels a little firm  
540.24 -> it doesn't really bounce you around or anything  but you're just not going to feel as cushy  
544.72 -> certainly not as cushy as the cx-30 fuel  economy on this turbo all-wheel drive  
551.6 -> 22 miles per gallon city and 27 highway it's not  really good by any measure the regular engine just  
558.88 -> a little bit better but i keep saying it all the  time these crossovers they're not that aerodynamic  
564.72 -> they use a lot of fuel just  because you get a small one  
568.16 -> doesn't mean you're getting a more efficient  one and there's no hybrid option on the cx-5
574.4 -> and a good driver's car is not  complete without good brakes  
578.64 -> and really natural progressive pedal feel
583.36 -> all the way to the end mazda really does  nail that part of the equation it's sporty
591.04 -> all right now i'm on team cx-30 what's  the first thing i notice comfort body roll  
598.24 -> they come together versus the cx-5 which is a lot  stiffer and it rides harsher this car well doesn't  
604.64 -> float but it definitely is more serene on these  back roads i feel more relaxed the ride quality is  
612.08 -> much better than the cx-5 and those are the major  differences you're going to find where the cx-5  
617.6 -> has sharper turn-in it exhibits almost no roll  not too much at all for a regular crossover and  
624 -> you get firmer ride and wax from those tires on  bumps the cx-30 kind of just ignores all that and  
630.32 -> kind of lapse it all up like a lincoln in a way  it really does when you're on some turns because  
635.92 -> this thing is lifted and remember it's another  half inch higher off the ground than the cx-5  
641.92 -> those little things do matter because all  that extra wheel travel that you'll see in  
646.48 -> the suspension well the center of gravity's higher  and despite this being still a good car to drive  
652.48 -> it's noticeably a little duller and the steering  doesn't respond as quickly it's good but you have  
659.44 -> to drive these two back to back like i'm doing to  notice that you might not feel it right away on  
664.64 -> your test drive if you have a cx-5 on the lot  and then another cx30 so i'd invite you just  
669.6 -> to actually go on a back road anything with  some turns and experience this for yourself
678.64 -> now what can i say about the engine exactly  what i said before about the cx-5 it  
683.04 -> it feels good and it moves but oh  that's nice actually the mid-range  
687.2 -> here i'm actually a little bit better than  the cx-5 and i'm not even in sport mode  
691.12 -> so let me put that on for a second  the switch is in the same place
696.88 -> again good but not great this engine makes  more torque than a bmw 330i a lot more and  
703.36 -> yet it just does not feel as quick so again turbo  or non-turbo that's going to be your call but the  
709.76 -> turbos i'm driving today i don't feel swayed by  them like the cx-5 the cx-30 just lacks some extra  
716.56 -> gears to really manage and extract all of the  torque in this engine so mazda has said that oh  
724.64 -> they don't really care about you know having the  sprightly really fast off the line acceleration  
730.56 -> but my bet is that they do and they can't replace  the transmission just yet six gears are looking  
735.92 -> really dated these days so that's the one part of  the cx-30 and the cx-5 that doesn't feel as modern  
744.4 -> oh yeah just a little bit more roll here but the  brakes still feel just as good as the cx-5 now  
750.8 -> the fuel economy on this car a little bit better  than the turbo cx-5 22 city which is even and 30  
757.28 -> highway versus 27 and again these are not great  numbers if you really want the 30 plus 40 plus you  
764.88 -> can get that on the smaller cars regular sedans  that aren't crossovers it's good because this  
771.68 -> is just more refined than a subaru or a nissan  honda a lot of those competitors they're fine  
778.32 -> but once you jump into cx30 or the cx-5 you  realize hey the more money i'm paying the  
784.56 -> nicer car i'm getting and it's simple it's these  little things that you feel not necessarily see  
789.84 -> in the interior because you know all this stuff is  really subjective right you may hate this interior  
794.56 -> you may not like the way it looks but the driving  portion is the stuff you feel every day behind the  
799.12 -> wheel and i think both these cars turn accelerate  and just ride down the road with a more refined  
806.16 -> feel than a lot of competitors so if comfort  and driving characteristics are important to you  
812.48 -> both these mazdas are going to work you just  have to ask yourself do you like handling or  
817.28 -> do you like ride quality that's the major  difference between the cx-30 and the cx-5  
823.04 -> what's really great about both cars how  much technology you get for the money  
828.8 -> the head up display is on the windshield  not a flip up piece of plastic it's really  
833.52 -> clear pretty good also the cx-30 gets a brand  new feature for 2021 that the cx-5 does not  
840.16 -> traffic jam assist press one button and up  to 40 miles an hour it'll self steer the car  
845.6 -> both cars have lots of driver assists forward  emergency braking with pedestrian detection  
850.96 -> lane departure lane keep assist auto high  beams and adaptive crews but the cx-5 has a  
857.76 -> better forward collision alert system that can see  people at night and break from higher speeds plus  
863.44 -> it comes with standard blind spot monitoring that  is not on the base cx-30 both cars are a 2021 iihs  
870.96 -> top safety pick plus and out of 20 small suvs the  cx-5 was the only one to score the top good rating  
878.8 -> in the agency's newest and tougher side impact  test beating out even the volvo xc40 and audi q3  
888.16 -> oh geez the infotainment controls  oh gosh as you can see they're bad  
892.72 -> on both cars and it's not a touch screen
897.2 -> a few other things are missing on both cars no  panoramic moon roof just this tiny sunroof no tire  
904.24 -> pressure readouts have no idea about those and on  the cx-5 there's not even a wireless charging pad  
910.8 -> but both cars have excellent 360-degree  cameras and great bose surround sound  
916.08 -> the cx-30 is loaded at 36-120 the cx-5 is  loaded at 38-805 both have all-wheel drive  
924.4 -> the powerful turbo engine and a lot of the  tech and nicer features found in luxury cars  
929.76 -> but the real competition comes from the toyota  rav4 hyundai santa fe and the new kia sportage  
936 -> these cars also offer hybrid engines with better  gas mileage and on the hyundai in kia better tech  
942.4 -> if you're going to stick with mazda the cx-5 is  going to be your default choice it's not that  
946.64 -> much bigger on the outside than the cx-30 and  yet inside you really feel the difference in  
951.52 -> space for both people and cargo now the cx30 is  definitely rides nicer it's cushier it's sleeker  
958.56 -> you may not need the bigger back seat and the  cargo hold of that cx-5 i like the handling so  
964.16 -> this is probably the one i would choose but the  point is both of these mazdas are a heck of a  
968.88 -> value they offer a lot more features for the money  than entry-level luxury crossovers from acura or  
974.88 -> lexus or even mercedes benz so tell us what  do you think and which mazda would you choose  
981.12 -> we're gonna review a lot more cars in the future  just like this so tell us what cars you want us to  
985.28 -> compare next subscribe to the cargurus youtube  channel go to cargurus.com to buy these cars  
990.4 -> they actually do exist i promise and  keep watching we'll see you next time

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT1b1yf7J7I